Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Just all over the place, personally

Since my last post I have been doing more reading in Grbich (2013).  Specifically, I have been reviewing classical ethnography and critical ethnography approaches.   I see connections between the criticisms of Carspecken’s approach and John Law (2004), as he advocates for flexibility in research.  Particularly, feeling myself very much in line with the critical approach, I appreciate the fourth bulleted criticism Grbich notes about researcher neutrality (p. 58).  Again, as Law underscores, all approaches are biased or “help to produce the reality that they understand” (p. 5).  Therefore, a critical approach should be as good as any.  

As for Chapter 22 of Grbich (2013), I think I need to sit down with Atlas or some of the other qualitative packages more, so I can experience their power.  Earlier this evening I wondered if I could find a program that would enable me to upload photos of underlined statements, categorize them by both author and themes, and generate information lists by author or theme.

Where my individual project for this course is concerned, I remain undecided.  Previously, I mentioned the abstract proposal I wanted to write for an oral history.  While I was very interested in studying my grandmother’s key social values, I doubt the feasibility of the idea.  As for a dissertation topic, here are some of the notes I’ve scribbled around the place or put into my phone over the past couple of months:

·         “Capitalism’s impact on teachers”
·         Suggesting a new feminism based on the female teacher, perhaps in the vein of Bell Hooks.  That is, teaching is not an occupation for the females of the bourgeoisie.  We are part of the exploited underclass, and maybe we would rather go home.
·         “Teachers: Unpaid labor for testing companies”
·         “Apparently, I’m not a professional, and that is just the tip of the iceberg”
·         “Dime a dozen: Oppressing the white female teacher”
·         “Worker bees, expendable bees”
·         “The pendulum swings backwards: The decline of education in the global economy of education”
·         Back to the Dark Ages: Neoliberalism and the decline of labor and education

Perhaps I could work on something of utility related to one of the above.  I gather I’d be taking a critical ethnographic approach with thematic analysis.  However, this summer I was instructed to write a theoretical dissertation proposal.  I consulted Edmund’s C. Short’s Forms of Curriculum Inquiry (1991) with chapters on ampliative criticism or the speculative essay, but I remained somewhat confused.  What I understood was writing in itself is a method and that I should just write a book. 

Where the group project is concerned, we are still considering options.  My idea is to take an ethnography or film and have each person evaluate it from a different approach per Grbich.  I am certainly not married to this idea, however.

3 comments:

  1. You have laid out some great ideas here, Jennifer. From the titles/topics you have listed, a critical approach definitely appears to me to be the way you are leaning. I don't want to box you in to method or analysis yet until we know exactly what you want to study. Indeed writing in and of itself is a method of inquiry. I have listed a chapter below from the Sage Handbook that might interest you. If it does, I can send it to you or post it via folio. (The one thing about blogs is that I can't attached anything!)

    Obviously, what I see in your list here is women/female teachers, education, money, power, and exploitation. The titles you have laid out hold a lot of assumptions about what is happening within the educational system to female teachers and perhaps this is based on your own experience or the experience of others close to you that you have witnessed. One thing you need to think about is how that will play into your use of a critical lens. Will you be able to identify the oppressor if it is not what you already perceive it to be? I think steering away from a title and considering a topic is the best route. Ultimately, the question you have to ask yourself is not "What do I want the world to know?" but "What do I want to know?" When you decide what it is you want to know (not what you already know) then you can formulate a question to ask that will guide your next steps.

    In a note to me, you asked about journals that might be interested in an article on your interests. You might consider starting with a few of these and then just going to Sage Journals and browsing their journal title list.

    Feminist Theory: An International Interdisciplinary Journal
    Qualitative Research in Education
    Critical Studies in Education

    Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 923-949). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for the great feedback. Please include the Denzin & Lincoln chapter in Folio. I am eager to read it! Also, would it be possible for me to work on both ethnographic and writing inquiries in this course? I had typed a longer response to your comment Friday or Saturday, but it did not appear. I've played around with the settings now, and I hope we can see this after I publish it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. okay will do that!

    ReplyDelete